NAIROBI, Kenya, Jun 26 – The Court of Appeal has rescinded in its entirety a ruling delivered on May 29 blocking the implementation of revised National Social Security Fund (NSSF) contribution rates after finding that the decision had been issued in error on an application that was not properly before the court. Breaking It Down In a ruling delivered on Friday, a three-judge bench comprising Justices Wanjiru Karanja, Kihara Kariuki Minoti and P
06/26/26 • 3 Views
NAIROBI, Kenya, Jun 26 – The Court of Appeal has rescinded in its entirety a ruling delivered on May 29 blocking the implementation of revised National Social Security Fund (NSSF) contribution rates after finding that the decision had been issued in error on an application that was not properly before the court.
📻 Breaking It Down
In a ruling delivered on Friday, a three-judge bench comprising Justices Wanjiru Karanja, Kihara Kariuki Minoti and Pauline Nyamweya held that the May 29 decision was founded on an apparent error on the face of the record because it determined an application that was not live before the court and on which parties had not been heard.
“The Court delivered the ruling dated 29th May 2026 on an application which was not live and on which the parties had not been heard,” the judges stated.
The ruling overturns a decision that had significant implications for NSSF contributions and the implementation of the NSSF Act, 2013.
📌 What You Need to Know
On May 29, the Court of Appeal declined to grant the NSSF Board of Trustees a stay of execution of a 2022 Employment and Labour Relations Court (ELRC) judgment that declared key provisions of the NSSF Act, 2013 unconstitutional.
In that decision, the appellate court rejected NSSF’s bid to temporarily suspend the effect of the ELRC judgment pending determination of its appeal, finding that the Fund had failed to demonstrate that denial of the stay would occasion irreparable harm to the pensions sector.
While the court acknowledged that NSSF had raised arguable legal questions, including whether the ELRC erred in finding that the Act required Senate participation before enactment, it held that the existence of an arguable appeal alone was insufficient to justify granting a stay.
NSSF subsequet move to continue with the revised rates strirred public debate with stakeholders including Law Society of Kenya (LSK) terming it unlawful.
However, the Court of Appeal has now found that the decision itself was rendered in error.
“It is a constitutional imperative that parties should be given the opportunity to be heard before any decision is made affecting their rights or interests,” the bench said.
📰 Source: Capital FM Kenya






