The Employment and Labour Relations Court at Machakos has ruled that constructive dismissal is not automatically established simply because an employee disagrees with a transfer or change of duties.

🇰🇪 Breaking It Down

Justice Jemimah Keli held that for a claim of constructive dismissal to succeed, an employee must demonstrate a fundamental breach of the employment contract by the employer that leaves resignation as the only reasonable option.

The court further ruled that employers retain the managerial prerogative to reasonably reassign employees.

“The warning is therefore twofold: employees must think carefully before rejecting reassignment outright, while employers must ensure every transfer is lawful, reasonable, and procedurally fair,” the court stated.

📌 What You Need to Know

According to the court, this particularly falls where attempts are made to accommodate their circumstances and follow due process.

In the dispute before the court, a Company had reassigned an employee who developed hearing complications in a noisy factory environment to cleaning duties.

The employee rejected the offer and insisted instead on being deployed as a security guard, a position the employer said was unavailable.

The court noted that the employee had been engaged through meetings and subjected to a disciplinary process under Section 41 of the Employment Act.

Additionally, there was an alternative role that had been offered but declined.

The court held that disagreement with a transfer or preference for a different role does not in itself amount to constructive dismissal.

📰 Source: Kenyans.co.ke