NAIROBI, Kenya July 28 – Deputy President Kithure Kindiki’s brief dismissal of viral claims that he had been stripped of key government responsibilities has now received backing from a governance expert, who says the controversy is based on a misunderstanding of Kenya’s legal framework rather than an actual transfer of power.

📻 Breaking It Down

The debate erupted after social media was flooded with reports alleging that President William Ruto had reassigned Kindiki’s role in coordinating intergovernmental affairs to Prime Cabinet Secretary Musalia Mudavadi.

However, Kindiki brushed aside the reports in a short message posted on X.

His response came as speculation continued online, although neither State House nor the Office of the Prime Cabinet Secretary has issued an official statement confirming that any such reassignment has taken place.

📌 What You Need to Know

Governance and devolution expert John Burugu argues that the claims have been exaggerated and fail to consider how Kenya’s intergovernmental system is established under the Constitution and various Acts of Parliament.

According to Burugu, if any administrative adjustments have been made, they should not be interpreted as stripping the Deputy President of constitutional or statutory powers.

Instead, he says the issue highlights a long-standing administrative gap created by the absence of a substantive Cabinet Secretary responsible for Devolution.

“The perceived loss, politically, by the Deputy President is misplaced because it is a move to correct a mistake by the same administration aimed at easing operational and administrative hiccups,” Burugu said.

He added that assigning certain administrative responsibilities elsewhere would merely address operational challenges rather than diminish the office of the Deputy President.

“Therefore, there is no political fodder as is being hyped over the matter,” he stated.

📰 Source: Capital FM Kenya