Kumbe Gachagua's supplementary affidavit just got thrown under the bus — respondents are arguing in court that the former DP filed documents faster than a matatu conductor collecting fares, without even asking the judge's permission first. Sawa, but here's where it gets juicy: the allegations inside? They're basically untestable, they say.

The Plot Thickens: Gachagua's Late-Game Legal Move Backfires

Picture this: the impeachment case against Rigathi Gachagua is already cooking in the High Court, right? Lakini suddenly, boom — he drops a supplementary affidavit like it's breaking news at 9 PM. The respondents' legal team is absolutely not having it. They're telling the three-judge bench that this move is sus, straight up. The affidavit was filed without court permission, introduces fresh allegations that were never presented during the Senate hearings, and basically tries to change the entire game midway through.

Think about it, aki — you can't just walk into a football match in the second half and introduce new rules. That's not how this works. The respondents are arguing that the court's job is to review whether Parliament and the Senate acted lawfully based on evidence that was actually presented during the impeachment process. Introducing new matters at this stage? That's a no-no, bana.

The Ruto Phone Call Allegation: Serious Accusations Needing Serious Proof

Here's where things get spicy. Among the contested claims in Gachagua's affidavit is an allegation that President William Ruto made a phone call to a hospital asking about the former DP's health. Si uone? That's a heavy accusation, and the respondents are saying such claims can't just be dropped like they're gossip at a local barbershop.

The lawyers are insisting that allegations of this magnitude require strict, verifiable proof. You can't just write "President called hospital" and expect everyone to nod along. The respondents want the court to subject every claim to scrutiny, verify the contents, and honestly, expunge the entire affidavit from the record if it doesn't meet the standard.

Timing Is Everything: Why Waiting Over a Year Raises Red Flags

Here's what's really got people talking — Gachagua allegedly waited over a year after these events supposedly happened before filing this affidavit. No explanation, no apology, just sudden submission. The respondents are pointing out that the former DP had multiple opportunities to present this evidence earlier but chose to stay silent. Why now? Why in the middle of court proceedings? Sijui, but it definitely looks strategic.

The High Court is expected to make a ruling soon on whether this affidavit even gets admitted. If judges reject it, Gachagua's case just took an L. If they accept it, the respondents will probably argue that the whole thing is compromised anyway.

The Jukwaa Take: Gachagua tried to pull a fast one on the court, and now the entire impeachment saga is about procedure and proper process — not even about the substantive issues anymore. That's what you call an own goal.

📰 Source: Capital FM Kenya