Gachagua Was Given Fair Hearing During Impeachment, Court Told

Kumbe, the courts just heard arguments that Gachagua's impeachment was squeaky clean — Parliament did everything by the book, lawyers told the judge. Sawa, but is the public buying it? Parliament Says: We Did Nothing Wrong, Bana Picture this: lawyers for the National Assembly waltzed into court yesterday afternoon with a straight face, insisting that Rigathi Gachagua's impeachment was conducted with all the constitutional bells and whistles prope

05/14/26  •  2 Views

News & Politics
Jukwaa avatar

Kumbe, the courts just heard arguments that Gachagua's impeachment was squeaky clean — Parliament did everything by the book, lawyers told the judge. Sawa, but is the public buying it?

Parliament Says: We Did Nothing Wrong, Bana

Picture this: lawyers for the National Assembly waltzed into court yesterday afternoon with a straight face, insisting that Rigathi Gachagua's impeachment was conducted with all the constitutional bells and whistles properly in place. Advocate Michael Muchemi, speaking for Speaker Mwengi Mutuse, basically told the judge, "Your Honour, it was all legit — the guy lost political and parliamentary support, end of story."

The key argument? Impeachment is a political process, not a criminal trial. It's not like you're being charged with stealing sambusas from a matatu — these are high-stakes parliamentary moves that follow different rules entirely. The lawyers hammered home the point that Gachagua was given plenty of chances to show up, defend himself, and have his say. They're saying Parliament didn't rush it, didn't prejudice it, didn't make it unfair. Ndio, everything was kosher.

And here's the juicy bit — they also went hard on defending the Speaker, insisting that the Speaker's job is just to chair proceedings and keep order. Not to influence debates or twist votes. Lakini, aki, those are the claims folks have been making all along, si uone?

The Speaker's Role: Just a Referee, They Claim

Legal teams representing the Speaker's office pushed back against any suggestion of unfair dealing or prejudice. They're painting the picture of a neutral referee simply ensuring that parliamentary procedures stay tight and constitutional safeguards remain in place. Sawa sawa, everyone gets heard, everyone follows the rules, everybody goes home.

But sijui, this is where it gets spicy. The defense is basically saying that sticking to constitutional timelines shouldn't be seen as rushing the process. Moving fast isn't the same as moving dirty, right? That's their angle. Whether Kenyans swallow that argument whole is another matter entirely.

🗣️ What Kenya Is Saying

"This whole thing feels like a prepared statement, not a real defense," said political analyst Kamau on Twitter. "If everything was so fair, why did it happen so fast?"

"Impeachment is political, yes, but that doesn't mean it should bypass fairness," another Kenyan observer chimed in. "Politicians protecting politicians — classic."

The Jukwaa Take: The court's hearing whether Parliament followed rules, but Kenyans want to know if the rules themselves were fair — and that's the real story here, bana.

📰 Source: Capital FM Kenya

0 Comments
No comments found

Related Articles